Paradise Lost and Recovering Eden in Ink Black Heart | Part Two: Annealed in Glass

Welcome to Part Two in our series of guest posts written by Dr. Beatrice Groves, author of Literary Allusion in Harry Potter. (You can find Part One here.) Dr. Groves teaches Shakespeare and Renaissance English Literature at Oxford University, and her blog Bathilda’s Notebook can be found over on Mugglenet. In this second and final part of the series, Dr. Groves discusses the Paradise of Eden as seen in three separate pieces of glass in The Ink Black Heart. (We’re sure you can guess which of these three is our favourite!)


Stained glass plays an important role in the only scene set on holy ground in Harry Potter. Harry and Hermione stand in Godric’s Hollow churchyard as Midnight Mass is celebrated, and the light streaming from inside this ‘jewel bright’ church shines through its ‘brilliant windows’ and falls on them. The snow on which they stand is transfigured by this light: ‘a blanket of pale blue that was flecked with dazzling red, gold and green wherever the reflections from the stained glass hit the snow’ (Deathly Hallows, Chap 16). The beauty of these stained-glass windows and the way in which they transmit that beauty to the world outside are an important part of the religiosity – the numinous aura – of this scene (I’ve written more about this here). George Herbert, one the greatest English religious poets, has written of stained-glass windows as a metaphor for people in their ability to transmit the divine:

Lord, how can man preach thy eternal word?
He is a brittle crazy glass;
Yet in thy temple thou dost him afford
This glorious and transcendent place,
To be a window, through thy grace.

But when thou dost anneal in glass thy story,
Making thy life to shine within…
…then the light and glory
More reverend grows, and more doth win.

(George Herbert, ‘The Windows’)

There are three stories ‘anneal[ed] in glass’ – as Herbert calls it – in The Ink Black Heart and I think they are connected, both with each other and with the religious colouring that stained glass carried in Deathly Hallows.

Herbert’s poem speaks to the simultaneous fragility of glass – ‘a brittle crazy glass’ – and its transcendent possibilities. When a stained-glass window is lit by the sun it becomes a ‘glorious and transcendent place.’ The brittle beauty of the three stories annealed in glass in The Ink Black Heart express the vitality and vulnerability of hope and human connection in the bleak, anomic world of this novel. The first two glass artworks in the novel are pieces of stained glass, and they are both images of Paradise.

The first is Christopher Whall’s ‘Adam Naming the Animals’ (1880) and this traditional Edenic image (seen by Robin at the William Morris Museum) primes the reader to recognise the Edenic hinterland of the secularised version that follows in the window at North Grove. In Mariam’s beautiful artwork we are shown what the commune could and should have been: the happy and creative coupling of Josh and Edie as the Adam and Eve of this perfectly realised imagined world. The final story told through glass in Ink Black Heart also represents a man and woman, and just as we saw Adam naming the animals in the first image, so some new naming has occurred here likewise. The images of Eden annealed in glass earlier in the novel suggest the hope that the union within the newly named ‘Strike and Ellacott Detective Agency’ does indeed represent a paradisal future for the pair.

Although, as mentioned in yesterday’s post the word ‘Eden’ only appears once in The Ink Black Heart, Eden appears in a visual representation when Robin follows the agency’s targets to Walthamstow:

…a stained-glass panel showing a naked Adam naming the animals. He sat round-shouldered on a grassy tussock, pointing at a tiger, while a bearded angel beside him recorded the chosen name in a book. Two tropical birds seemed to be poking out of the top of the angel’s halo. Adam’s expression was vacant, even clueless.

Groomer and Legs were standing with their backs to Robin on the other side of the room, discussing the symbolism of the pelican in a design by Edward Burne- Jones…. Robin had been pleasantly surprised when her targets pulled into the car park of the William Morris Gallery… Having explained the Christian symbolism of the pelican, which was feeding her chicks with her own blood, Groomer wondered aloud whether Legs was ready for a coffee. (Chap 16, 143-44).


The animals in Whall’s ‘Adam Naming the Animals’ are rather lovely, and they include a Pelican which gets fuller treatment in Burne-Jones’s depiction (drawn in the same year and hung, according to The Ink Black Heart at least, opposite it in the same room). The narrative voice is quite right about Adam, whose expression is vacant to the last degree, but it has simplified what is happening with the angel: ‘a bearded angel beside him recorded the chosen name in a book.’ Actually, divine knowledge (symbolised as another book placed in the top right of the image) emits beams of light that fall simultaneously on Adam and the Book into which the angel writes. The symbolism of the stained glass suggests that divine inspiration (from the divine book) is directly active both in Adam’s knowledge of the animals and in the book of nature into which it is written (which is a pleasing piece of two-text symbolism given the text-within-a-text nature of The Ink Black Heart!)

The Christian symbolism of the pelican will, of course, return in Highgate cemetery – the place where inspiration first struck Edie was ‘near a grave Edie always liked. It’s got a pelican on it’ (p.618). The Ink Black Heart takes care to remind the reader of the traditional symbolism of the pelican (which had been explained nearly 500 pages earlier):

To Robin’s slight surprise, she saw again the image she’d heard Groomer explaining to Legs back in the William Morris Gallery: the mother pelican plucking at her own breast, with a nest full of hungry chicks, beaks upturned, ready to be fed with her blood.

The girls surrounding the young man in the Drek T-shirt were now clutching each other.

‘That’s it, that must be it!’

‘Oh my God,’ breathed the girl in the Paperwhite T-shirt, speaking through the fingers she pressed to her mouth. ‘I’m going to cry.’

The guide had stopped too. Turning to face the group, and ignoring the agitation displayed by the Ink Black Heart fans, he said:

‘This unusual headstone is that of Elizabeth, Baroness de Munck. The device of the pelican represents sacrifice. This tomb was erected by Elizabeth’s daughter, Rosalbina…’

But Robin wasn’t listening. She’d just remembered what Josh Blay had said about the place where they’d had the first ideas for the cartoon – the place where Edie had been murdered. ‘Near a grave Edie always liked. It’s got a pelican on it.’ (p.647)

Elizabeth Baird-Hardy and John Granger have discussed the symbolism of the Pelican in some detail (here and here), and Elizabeth’s piece shows how it remained popular in the nineteenth century (the aesthetic home of this novel): ‘the pelican is the second-most popular bird symbol in cemetery art, ranking just behind the extremely popular dove.’

The Christian symbolism of the Pelican can be found throughout literature and a favourite example of mine is in The True Chronicle Historie of King Leir (Shakespeare’s source play for King Lear) in which Leir compares himself to ‘the Pellican/ That kils it selfe, to save her young ones lives’ while his daughter Cordella is compared with the Phoenix (the Pelican’s sister-bird in Christological symbolism). It is an image that Shakespeare remembers- but reverses – in King Lear by focusing on the ‘Pelicane daughters’ who tear the flesh of their parent rather than the loving sacrifice of the parent bird. Another example which pairs the Pelican and the Phoenix – making their Christological symbolism inescapable – is this fabulous pair of miniatures painted of Elizabeth I by Nicholas Hilliard.

The Pelican in her Piety is a strikingly Christological animal to find in Strike, but it is one I have been waiting for.

Last month Rowling ran a Twitter competition encouraging us to (accurately or wittily) guess the plot to Running Grave – and *many* congratulations to @LudicrousMonica who actually won this competition! (I hope you will wear Narciso and chat Sheep Management on your fabulous dinner!). My guess failed to bring home the prize, but I was nonetheless was delighted when Rowling commented on it:

She has spotted that we’re paying attention to her headers, but she does not, I suspect, know the half of it. She put up a pelican as her Twitter header in May 2018 and I’ve been waiting ever since for this superbly symbolic bird to make an appearance.

I discussed this beautiful header (from the thirteenth-century Aberdeen Bestiary) at the time and, while it fitted in with the general importance of bestiaries for Fantastic Beasts (as I’ve discussed in detail here) no actual pelicans have turned up in her work until now.

The text underneath this superb image runs:

https://www.abdn.ac.uk/bestiary/ms24/f35r

[The mother pelican] lets her blood pour over the bodies of the dead, and so raises them from the dead. In a mystic sense, the pelican signifies Christ… It kills its young with its beak as preaching the word of God converts the unbelievers. It weeps ceaselessly for its young, as Christ wept with pity when he raised Lazarus. Thus after three days, it revives its young with its blood, as Christ saves us, whom he has redeemed with his own blood.

The Pelican in her Piety, most visible in The Ink Black Heart in the grave-image Edie is so drawn to, is also present in Whall’s ‘Adam Naming the Animals’ as well as in Burne-Jones’s beautiful cartoon opposite. ‘Cartoon’, centuries before animated cartoons were thought of, meant something done on paper: from French carton or Italian cartone ‘augmentative of carta paper:’ ‘A drawing on stout paper, made as a design for a painting of the same size to be executed in fresco or oil, or for a work in tapestry, mosaic, stained glass, or the like’ (Oxford English Dictionary). And this, indeed, gestures once more at the religious stained-glass symbolism in Ink Black Heart as it is a cartoon for a stained-glass window.

The striking religiosity of Whall’s ‘Adam Naming the Animals,’ and perhaps even the pelican stained-glass cartoon, is recalled when Robin next looks at a secular paradise annealed in glass:

Directly opposite Robin was a large and beautiful stained-glass window that she guessed was Mariam’s work. It had been cleverly illuminated with an artificial light source on the exterior of the building, so that even in the evening light it cast patches and flecks of cerulean, emerald and crimson light over the scrubbed wooden table and the many large pots and pans hanging on the walls. At first glance Robin thought the window might depict a vision of paradise, but the many people depicted there bore no wings or halos. They were working cooperatively on different tasks: planting trees and picking fruit, tending a fire and cooking over it, building a house and decorating its front with garlands…. Robin glanced up at the stained-glass window again, trying to make out Edie or Josh. She had a suspicion they might be the two people picking fruit: both had long brown hair and the female figure was throwing apples down to the male. Then she noticed, with a little start of surprise, the ruby-coloured glass letters set across the top of the picture, like a biblical verse.

A state of anomie is impossible
wherever organs in solidarity with one another
are in sufficient contact,
and in sufficiently lengthy contact. (372, 376)

This is, of course, a crucial clue – but we are also given a number of pointers here to recognise this as an Edenic re-imagining of North Grove: it depicts a man, a woman and an apple tree; Robin thinks at first that it is an image of paradise and words are set above it ‘like a biblical verse’ in a church window. As Gerard Manley Hopkins writes in his wonderful sonnet ‘Spring’ every fresh spring, each new start, has ‘A strain of the earth’s sweet being in the beginning/ In Eden garden.’

This window expresses the way in which something good – both Edie and Josh’s initially joyful relationship and the ideals of North Grove – has fallen away from that Edenic hope, has ‘sour[ed] with sinning.’  But the final story written in glass in Ink Black Heart inverts this trajectory.

In doing so – in showing how good can come out of destructive acts – it echoes something that is central to Milton’s poetic creative reimagining of the Fall. When Adam hears about the Incarnation in Paradise Lost, he rejoices:

Oh goodness infinite, goodness immense!
That all this good of evil shall produce,
And evil turn to good; more wonderful
Than that which by creation first brought forth
Light out of darkness! Full of doubt I stand,
Whether I should repent me now of sin
By me done and occasioned, or rejoice
Much more, that much more good thereof shall spring. (12.469-76)

This idea that the Fall might actually be something to rejoice at because it brought the gift of the Incarnation is a traditional Christian idea known as the ‘fortunate fall’ or felix culpa. The belief that Paradise Lost subscribes to this view was rejected by many critics at the end of the 20th century, critics who rightly recognised that Adam’s tentative recognition of his sin as a ‘happy fault’ is phrased as a question, reanimating the paradox within the felix culpa idea. But I think that Paradise Lost does encourage the reading of the ‘fortunate fall’ (as I’ve discussed in my book The Destruction of Jerusalem in Early Modern English Literature) and one reason for thinking this is that God’s creative redeployment of evil for good is not a lone insight of Adam but a central theme of the poem. Over and over again Paradise Lost tells us that this is how God works: ‘his providence/ Out of our evil seek to bring forth good’; ‘all his malice served but to bring forth/ Infinite goodness, grace and mercy’; ‘evil/ Thou usest, and from thence creat’st more good’ (1.162-3; 217-8; 7.615-6).

Central to Paradise Lost is the idea that evil cannot win: ‘evil/ Thou usest, and from thence creat’st more good.’ Satan’s actions are used against him by God whose reflex is always to make ‘evil turn to good’ (12.471). Satan’s instigation of the Fall will be answered by the gift of Christ. Paradise Lost writes the Christian story as an inversion of the story of Pandora and Prometheus – Eve’s eating of the apple (the Christian version of Pandora’s opening of the box) is not the punishment for Prometheus’s sin in trying to save mankind, but its opposite: the gift of Christ, the new Prometheus is the result not the instigation of the Fall.

This optimistic reading of evil hoist on its own petard is central to Paradise Lost, and it is shared by Harry Potter. At the centre of Harry Potter is the idea that Voldemort’s decision to commit a terrible crime – the murder of a baby – was what gave that baby the power to defeat him. The bleak world of The Ink Black Heart contains only a tiny refraction of this idea of good coming out of evil, but it is a pleasing connection nonetheless. The bomb that destroys the Agency’s office does not only get rid of a sofa which, it seems, will be much missed among the Strike fandom, it also enables Strike to anneal in glass an acknowledgement that someone has transformed his agency – and his life – for the better.

The Ink Black Heart has created a new bond between Strike and Robin – we learn that they are going to become godparents to the same child (a duo of godparents – replacing the lone godparents of Harry Potter [Sirius (to Harry) and Harry (to Teddy Lupin)] symbolic of the way in which the singular hero of Harry Potter has been replaced by the twin-heroes of Strike). And their new professional parity has likewise now been openly expressed. The evil act of the bomber necessitates new glass for the door, providing the opportunity for Strike to give Robin a gift which is also a promise. Evil is transmuted into a new togetherness, writ in glass. The Edenic promise of a perfect union between a man and woman – seen in the stained glass earlier in the novel – finds its realisation in this moment which is likewise an apotheosis of the hope felt by Robin as she first glimpsed in that glass the life she had longed for:

Robin stood quite still, with her mouth slightly open, experiencing a moment of wonder… her lifelong, secret, childish ambition…

Taking this…. vow… gave back to her some of the mystique, even glamour, that she had imagined lay beyond the engraved glass door ….

Five years previously, the words engraved on the glass had read: ‘C. B. Strike, Private Detective’, but no longer. She was now looking at ‘Strike and Ellacott Detective Agency.’

(Cuckoo’s Calling, Chaps 1 and 6; Ink Black Heart, Chap 107)

Paradise Lost and Recovering Eden in The Ink Black Heart | Part One: Satan

We’re so thrilled to be able to share with you this two-part series of guest posts written by Dr. Beatrice Groves, author of Literary Allusion in Harry Potter. Dr. Groves teaches Shakespeare and Renaissance English Literature at Oxford University, and her blog Bathilda’s Notebook can be found over on Mugglenet. In this first part, Dr. Groves explores the connections between The Ink Black Heart and Milton’s Paradise Lost, as well as the parallels between Anomie and The Silkworm’s Elizabeth Tassel. We hope you enjoy!


In The Ink Black Heart we see the author – someone who sits at the heart of one of the largest fandoms in the world – enjoying imagining herself into the role of being on the other side for once. In the Wally Cardew YouTube video the (accurately placed) italics of a legal document cleverly express the disdain of the speaker:

‘intellectual property of Edie Ledwell and Joshua Blay, ‘ereinafter called the
creators…’

‘Fuckin’ bullshit, man,’ said MJ, shaking his head. (p.111)

The fandom of ‘Ink Black Heart’ is outraged at Edie Ledwell and Joshua Blay being called ‘the creators’ and demanding creative control over what they have created. At the surface level Ink Black Heart deals with very modern tussles between fandoms and writers over creative ownership. At a deeper level it reflects on the concept of the ‘death of the author’ (famously trumpeted by Roland Barthes in 1967) by literalising it – but at its dark heart there seems to be something more theological going on. The hatred so many of the characters expend on Edie Ledwell for creating something they love reflects a reflex of ingratitude towards the creator, a refusal to acknowledge the innate human condition of being beholden to others.

Watching Time Bandits the other day (if you don’t know it, I thoroughly recommend – Sean Connery as Agamemnon is not to be missed!) I was reminded of how the idea of the Devil as sensitive of the idea that he might be a ‘creature’ (something created) rather than an Ultimate Being has permeated popular culture.

This idea (like so many theological ideas) can be traced back to Augustine, but one of its most well-known expressions is in Milton’s epic poem Paradise Lost. In this poem Satan defiantly declares that he is ‘self-begot’:

Remember’st thou
Thy making, while the maker gave thee being?
We know no time when we were not as now;
Know none before us, self-begot, self-raised
By our own quickening power, when fatal course
Had circled his full orb, the birth mature
Of this our native heaven, ethereal sons.
Our puissance is our own. (Book 5.857-64)

Anomie, like Milton’s Satan, has a certain charisma; but like him also he is fundamentally confused about being ‘self-begot, self-raised’ and The Ink Black Heart as a whole ruminates on some fairly Miltonic ideas about creation going wrong when it wanders too far from its creator. As Anomie pulls away from accepting the creativity of others, he grows increasingly monomaniacal: repudiating Edie, never fairly acknowledging Morehouse as co-creator of ‘Drek’s Game,’ and then murdering them both, along with his literal progenitor, by the end of the novel.

Anomie as both a character and an attribute is at the centre of The Ink Black Heart which Rowling calls ‘a novel about disconnection’ (discussed here). The animation of Anomie in ‘Drek’s Game’ as nothingness – an empty cloak – is a brilliantly Satanic touch, related to Augustine’s idea about evil as uncreated: an absence, not a presence. As I wrote in Literary Allusion in Harry Potter – discussing the influence of Paradise Lost on the presentation of evil in Harry Potter:

Augustine of Hippo, one of the most influential Christian thinkers, has argued that evil has no positive existence; that it is, rather, an absence of good: ‘what, after all, is anything we call evil except the privation of good?’ Rowling has commented that, for her, likewise ‘“evil” is something that exists in the negative – it’s the absence of the empathy and moral code that enables acts of kindness and love.’ This comment suggests that Rowling has been influenced by Augustine’s famous formulation of evil as something that ‘has no being’; it is ‘something that exists in the negative.’

I think Rowling’s attitude to evil as ‘something that exists in the negative’ has continued into The Ink Black Heart – a photo-negative novel of how this idea plays out in Harry Potter. Gus recognises this aspect of non-being in himself and actually calls Anomie ‘a void-like creature into which all unsatisfactory characters disappear’ (p.604). Strike has the revelation late in the book that Drek is Death. The unspoken corollary of this is that Anomie is Satan.

Paradise Lost is a submerged influence in a novel that – in its numerous epigraphs –wears a number of its literary sources in plain sight. In a question, posted by Nick Jeffrey and written by John Granger, during last October’s Twitter Q&A Rowling acknowledged that these literary allusions go deeper than might at first appear:

Marian Erle – the character in Elizabeth Barrett Browning’s long blank verse poem Aurora Leigh (1856) on whom Rowling based Zoe Haigh – has read Milton’s epic. She learns to read from half-torn volumes given to her by pedlars and among the pages of Shakespeare, Bunyan, Thomson and Burns she learns of ‘Edens Lost’ (3.981) – Barrett Browning’s way of telling us that Marian has read Paradise Lost. And perhaps it is the poem, as much as the biblical Eden, that comes to Marian’s mind when she realises that she is shut out from the world to which she wishes to belong.

By slow degrees it broke on her slow sense…
That she too in that Eden of delight
Was out of place, and, like the silly kid,
Still did most mischief where she meant most love.
A thought enough to make a woman mad. (Aurora Leigh, Book 6 ll.942-46)

This is from a passage in which Marian Erle comes to the realisation that the man she is devoted to and engaged to marry – Romney Leigh – does not love her. It forms the epigraph to Chapter 33 of The Ink Black Heart (the crucial chapter in which we meet the murderer for the first time) and is that novel’s only use of the word ‘Eden.’ (For more on the importance of Aurora Leigh have a listen to the Strike and Ellacott Files special episode 12.5 ‘Ink Black Heart Epigraphs’ in which we discuss it in depth!)

The epigraphic use of ‘Eden’ here appears to reference the idyllic early life in North Grove and the creative love-affair between Edie and Josh, which Katya – like poor Marian Erle – is drawn to, but also feels excluded from. Katya goes to North Grove as an escape and finds a seemingly youthful simplicity there: ‘It was all… just rather fun. All their friends doing the voices… Tim’s a lovely man and… it was fun, that’s all’ (p.304). Katya’s devotion to Josh is clear in this chapter as are her husband’s insinuations that what she feels for Josh is not reciprocated: ‘If he feels sorry for anyone,’ said Inigo nastily, ‘it isn’t Kea Niven.’ (305). The Edenic space referenced by the epigraph – already irrevocably soured with sinning before the novel begins – is North Grove, with its temptingly vernal name, at the time when Edie and Josh are newly in love and enjoying their new creation of The Ink Black Heart, innocent of all that would follow.

It is only on a reread that it seems perhaps that there is a deeper meaning to the ‘Eden’ of this epigraph – the snake who hides in this chapter. In Milton’s poem Satan is jealous of God’s love for his new creation:

Of some new race, called Man, about this time
To be created like to us, though less
In power and excellence, but favoured more
Of him who rules above.

(Paradise Lost, 2.348-51)

Satan’s antagonism towards these ‘puny habitants’ (2.367) springs in part from embittered affection (what is God doing favouring someone more than me?). Gus is a fatal prey to jealousy likewise. Part of his warped incentive to murder Edie is his inability to cope with feeling as Marian Erle feels in this epigraph – a ‘silly kid’ rejected from the Eden of a relationship with her and her creative world, even if that relationship is a mere figment of his own imagination.

This Satanic aspect of Anomie – his jealous of the creativity and love of others – is the answer, I think, to Rowling’s slightly surprising answer to my question about the novel’s parallels with Silkworm which she gave during last October’s brilliant Q&A session (hosted by JKR’s Barmy Book Army). Nick Jeffrey very kindly posed her this question on my behalf:

Beyond the text-within-a-text parallel how do you see the links with Silkworm playing out in IBH? Were the choice of genre/time based epigraphs part of this?

Rowling replied:

It’s a reverse image of Silkworm in some ways. This time, the killer isn’t a creator, though we surmise they’d like to be.

I wrote this up at an earlier blog at Hogwart’s Professor (here) and it is a parallel that rests on John Granger’s early insights into the chiastic form of Harry Potter and the ways in which Strike appears to echo that. (How this plays out now that we know the series will have ten books remains to be seen, but up to this point the parallels, as discussed in the blog above, have been convincing – and, for any sceptics out there! – they have now been confirmed by Rowling herself in this tweet.)

But why does Rowling say: ‘this time, the killer isn’t a creator, though we surmise they’d like to be’? Gus is a brilliant artist and has drawn a beautifully rendered game creating, in ‘Drek’s Game,’ a deeply popular parody of ‘The Ink Black Heart.’ This would seem to justify him as a ‘creator’ far more than Liz Tassel (who has merely created a parody of Bombyx Mori out of a patchwork of Quine’s own novel and his previous works). The clue, I think, lies precisely in the word ‘parody.’

As Andrew Fichter has argued, in response to Augustine’s insight of evil as something that ‘has no being,’ in Milton – as in much Christian literature – evil ‘exists only as parody.’ 1 In Paradise Lost, for example, Satan’s incestuous relationship with Sin and Death is a parodic version of the Trinity. Liz Tassel’s first sin – the act which all her others are trying to cover up – is a brutal parody (which leads to Ellie Fancourt’s suicide). Parody forms the closest of parallels between the second and sixth Strike novels for in both there are two texts-within-the-text accompanied by a tussle over the authorship of these texts. The true author (Quine, Ledwell) is killed by the person who has also created a parasitic version of their text (Tassel, Anomie). In both cases the killer is the creator of the text-within-the-text which exists as a parody of the text of the author they destroy.

But a central difference between Tassel and Anomie lies in the motivation for this murder. Anomie – unlike Tassel, who is simply acting pragmatically to cover her tracks – is desperate to be considered ‘the’ creator. He wants to be a part of ‘The Ink Black Heart’ as a scriptwriter and for his creation (Anomie) to appear within it. He bombards Josh with DMs about it, DMs that speak to a narcissistic belief that he – not Edie or Josh – is the true creator of ‘The Ink Black Heart’s’ success.

The Ink Black Heart has no truck with fans who think they are the creator – Anomie’s fantasy leads to his descent into becoming a serial killer, but even Kea (who suffers from the same delusion without trying to act out the ‘death of the author’ in such painfully literal terms) is treated fairly mercilessly. Kea’s letter about her own sufferings written to Josh as he lies paralysed in hospital – someone she claims to love but whose unimaginable suffering she shields herself from attempting to imagine – drips with a self-pity which is difficult to read. Tassel and Anomie both create a parody of the original ‘text’ – an original which both, in their own way, admire (I like the detail of Tassel keeping the incriminating text of the original Bombyx Mori because she was enough of a literature-lover that, cold-hearted author-murderer that she was, she couldn’t destroy a text). But Anomie’s crime is bound up in his desire to be part of the original – he wants to write and star in ‘The Ink Black Heart’ itself, not just the spin-off game he has created. Anomie mistakes himself for the creator in a way that Tassel does not. As Gus writes to Josh, seemingly blind to the irony: ‘Your pretensions to being hero-creator are now utterly destroyed… There can be only one Ἀρχηγέτης’ (p.604). Strike explains this as relating ‘to the Archegetes heroes… Ancient Greeks who founded settlements or colonies’ (p.604). Archegetes means ‘leader’ or ‘founder’ – which in itself is self-aggrandising. But it is also interesting that this word derives not from heroes but from Apollo – ‘Archegetes’ is an epithet of Apollo, worshipped in his aspect of founder.

Gus’s view of himself as the creator god – the Apollo – of ‘The Ink Black Heart’ is perfectly in keeping with his narcissistic self-image. Gus, like the Satan of Milton and medieval mystery plays, covets the creator’s throne. His creation existing only as parody betrays the Satanic nature of his jealous self-delusion that he himself is the creator. Anomie ‘isn’t a creator, though we surmise they’d like to be’ in Rowling’s mind because she does not intend to give him that satisfaction.

1 A. Fichter, A. (1982) Poets Historical: Dynastic Epic in the Renaissance (New Haven: Yale University Press), p.59.